Select an item by clicking its checkbox


January 01, 1970

Nyasha Junior

About Nyasha Junior

Dr. Nyasha Junior is Associate Professor in the Department of Religion at Temple University in Philadelphia. She holds a Ph.D. in biblical studies from Princeton Theological Seminary. She writes, teaches, speaks, and frequently tweets on race, gender, religion, and their intersections. She is the author of An Introduction to Womanist Biblical Interpretation (Westminster John Knox Press, 2015). Her current projects include Reimagining Hagar: Blackness and Bible (Oxford University Press) and Black Samson: The Untold Story of an American Icon (Oxford University Press). Her public scholarship has appeared in The Washington PostInside Higher EdBuzzfeed, and other media outlets. She is passionate about grits, Star Trek, and Octavia Butler. Visit nyashajunior.com and follow her on Twitter (@NyashaJunior).

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. I included Brian Bantum’s piece on Ferguson in the first week of a new Scripture class we are introducing with our new curriculum. To me, there are core questions about bodies and identity that the Bible confronts over and over again in ways too often downplayed in Christian communities. I hoped to start the semester by addressing these questions head-on.

  2. I wrestled with this question, too, as I prepared my own Intro to the OT syllabus for a predominantly white class of students at a liberal arts college. And I chose not to discuss Ferguson on the first day for some of the same reasons you did. I’m also trying to defamiliarize the Bible for them and show how complicated the process of interpretation is, especially the process of making sense of the biblical texts in our (post)modern contexts. That said, the class also tries to explore this process by asking students to debate the role and meaning of the Bible in contemporary issues. The students chose the topics for debate and I’m hoping to direct their attention to matters of race and identity, violence and its legitimation and abuse, and oppression and protest that are raised by the events of Ferguson.

  3. I haven’t blogged about it, yet, because I experienced Mike Brown’s murder and Ferguson through the prism of my time in Jerusalem this July — which I find extremely difficult to write about. Then I arrived back home just a few days before the term started, so that pivot was not smooth.

    As for syllabi, the best place for Ferguson would be in a late unit in one of my courses, not first day. So I’m thinking about that, or about doing a public event in a talk series I’m organizing. Or both. (No, I’m not organized going into this term.)

    Finally, I have always maintained certain boundaries between writing and academics. The only way in which I feel capable of responding to Ferguson is as a writer, not as a scholar. A writer whom nobody reads.

  4. I started my Introductory class today, and I did not speak about Fergusson or Michael Brown, although I have reflected quite a bit on how “the Bible” has been used in events around Mr. Brown’s death – specifically, how funeral-service biblical interpretations continue to function as sites of contestation and protest about Black identity and Black life. How does one read the Bible after gunshots? I still need to get to know my students and let them know me before taking up the question of race/ethnicity. My syllabus does include a lecture on “The Hebrew Bible and Ethnicity/Race” (a broad topic, I can’t help myself) and I plan to address some of the pressing issues of power, violence and racial/ethnic identity.

  5. I talked about Ferguson in World Religions today, though I don’t pretend to have done a great job with it. I passed out a short article on Al Sharpton’s recent visit and used it as an occasion to ask the questions: what role does/can religion play in a political event of this nature? We also talked about the importance of knowing one’s history in order to make sense of religious actions. I really didn’t have anything helpful to “tell” them about Ferguson, but I wanted to start them thinking about religion as something current and active. Perhaps I would have been wiser to leave it alone for the time being.

  6. There has been no public discussion on my campus about Michael Brown’s death or the civic unrest in Ferguson that followed. I added to this silence by not referencing either Brown or Fergusion on the first day of class. Part of my decision to remain silent about Brown’s killing has to due with my own uneasiness with having to confront the reality head-on that Black dead bodies don’t warrant the attention of students who tend to populate my classrooms. A white female colleague reported her utter amazement at how few students in her class had even the sketchiest familiarity with the Brown and Ferguson case. Honestly, I don’t know if I could have kept myself together had I introduced the topic and discovered that the vast majority of students found it to be new news. My unsettled thoughts and feelings about this unfolding drama of race and lynching-style law enforcement sickens me. And that’s not a good – healthy -way for me to start my classes.

  7. I’m not a professor, but I am a pastor. Sunday will be my first day back in the pulpit after summer vacation. I will address as part of a sermon: Be the Change.

    Enjoy your work . . . look forward to more . . .

    Rev. Alfie Wines, Ph.D. Pastor, Bible Scholar, Theologian

  8. Thanks to everyone who has commented. I appreciate your taking the time to share your choices and your reasoning.

Wabash Center